Valentine’s Day Carpaccio – A Meat Heart for Your Sweetheart!

0 comments
I like carpaccio. My wife and Valentine, Michele, likes carpaccio. So for us, a heart-shaped version of this classic Italian beef salad seems nothing short of fabulous. Of course, I do understand that this isn’t for everyone. If you don’t like, or more likely, are afraid of rare meat, I don’t imagine you’ll be giving this a try.

That’s perfectly fine, and we’re all too busy to bother trying to convert you over to the red team. However, for people that do enjoy this classic dish, and realize that properly handled, high-quality beef is no more dangerous to eat raw than sushi, or a spinach salad, I think this would make for a creative, and visually arresting start to their Valentine’s Day dinner menu.

While this preparation is fairly classic, I do like to keep my beef a little bit thicker than is traditionally done. Most carpaccios are pounded very, very thin, but if you’re using a really nice piece of beef tenderloin, why smash it so flat? Since it’s naturally tender and buttery, I like it to keep a little bit of its texture, instead of being mashed too thin.

Another tip is to season the meat generously. The salt is very important here, almost as much as some kind of bracing salad tossed with a sharp, acidic dressing. By the way, just because I went with arugula and traditional lemon mustard dressing, doesn’t mean you can’t take this in other exotic directions.

I’ve enjoyed some great renditions over the years, including several which incorporated Asian ingredients into the mix. As usual, I’d love to hear about (and maybe see?) how you adapt this carpaccio to your own personal tastes. Enjoy!


Ingredients for 2 portions:
4-6 oz freshly trimmed, high-quality, beef tenderloin, sliced thin
1 cup baby arugula leaves
1 oz shaved Parmigiano-Reggiano
2 tsp capers
For the dressing:
1 tsp Dijon mustard
1 1/2 tbsp freshly squeezed lemon juice
2 tbsp extra virgin olive oil
salt and pepper to taste
pinch of cayenne

Read More »

Important Progress on the Islamic Calendar Problem

0 comments

This is a weekly post by Nidhal Guessoum (see his earlier posts here). Nidhal is an astrophysicist and Professor of Physics at American University of Sharjah and is the author of Islam's Quantum Question: Reconciling Muslim Tradition and Modern Science. 
Ten days ago, I took part in a two-day conference in Paris, France, on the necessity of adopting an astronomical calendar in the determination and adoption of Islamic dates, particularly for holy occasions such as Ramadan, Eids, and Hajj. The conference, titled ‘Islamic lunar calendar in light of scientific knowledge’, was organized by the Union of Islamic Organizations of France, in partnership with the European Council for Fatwas and Research and the Federation of Islamic Organizations in Europe.
The aim of the conference was for some of the important Islamic organizations in France and in Europe to (finally) officially adopt an astronomical-calculation methodology in the determination of Islamic occasions in lieu of the traditional and problematic naked-eye or even telescope-observation of the crescent on the eve of the occasion.
Regular and long-time readers of Irtiqa know that I have been fighting for this for a long time; indeed, I’ve written about this before (here at Irtiqa, but also at Huff-Po and at Oumma.com for the francophone public), and last August an article in Science highlighted my efforts on this issue. I should also point to strong efforts made by ICOP, the ‘Islamic Astronomy’ organization in which I play a leading role, efforts which include previous conferences on the subject (see an earlier report of mine here).
This Paris conference, however, is highly significant in two ways: a) this signals a serious shift in the position of important Islamic organizations in Europe (and there are indications that other Islamic organizations in France and elsewhere will follow suit); b) the European Council for Fatwas and Research, which co-organized the conference and provided it with the Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) backing, is headed by Sheikh Al-Qaradawi, the leading authority of the Sunni world, which indicates a new stand in the Arab-Muslim world as well.
This is not the first time such a bold step is taken. Indeed, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) has for at least 5 years now adopted a fully calculated Islamic calendar, which includes dates for Ramadan and Eids, a calendar which does away with sightings, local or otherwise, with naked eyes or telescopes. But ISNA has received much criticism and condemnation for that avant-garde standpoint, and form so far away it couldn’t really have much of an impact on the Muslim-majority world. European Islamic organizations, with their closeness (geographical and ideological) to the scholars and officials of the Arab-Muslim world, are a different case in point.
It was interesting that during the conference, where half the speakers came from Europe and half from the Arab-Muslim world, the discourse oscillated between the pragmatic goals and the traditional views. The European participants (most of them Muslim immigrants from the Arab world) kept relating stories of how they couldn’t even request a day off from work to celebrate Eid because the date couldn’t be set in advance, how their children felt that their religion is unable to adapt to the modern world, how the traditional determination on the eve of a holy occasion created divisions among Muslims (various groups following different countries), etc. And it was poignant to see the Arab-Muslim scholars while fully cognizant of those real-life problems of Muslims in Europe unable to jump away from the Islamic jurisprudential arguments of more than a thousand years ago.
Even the astronomers (four of us) were not always adamant or forceful about the need to make the conceptual shift from the traditional approach to the modern astronomical calendar methods. But by the end of the first day, with the push from the public, the European scholars, and the astronomers, it became clear that a bold resolution and communiqué were the only logical outcome that could be expected from the conference. (Participants, imams, and community leaders, from Germany, Sweden, Poland, and elsewhere, were begging the scholars not to send them back with the same old problematic approach.)
In the end, the right resolution was adopted, with a firm decision to determine all Islamic dates on astronomical bases (including for the holy Ramadan and Eids, but not for Hajj, which will always be set by the Saudi government). Some debates took place between the astronomers and the European Muslim community leaders as to the kind of Islamic calendar that should be adopted, and though I did not fully endorse the particular solution that the Europeans wanted (one which accorded with the Turkish approach and adopted a principle of a crescent visible anywhere in the world), I insisted that what is important at this stage – and this is what needs to be strongly hailed – is the fact that we will now do away with observations altogether.
I am eager to see what kind of impact this development will have on the rest of the Muslim organizations and communities in Europe and (there will have to be some effect) in the Arab world (nearby North Africa in particular) and beyond.

Read More »

This guy is probably going to be executed because of his Tweets

0 comments
by Salman Hameed

At a theoretical level, we can analyze the reasons why freedom of speech can be a tricky issue for nations for various reasons. We can also see why more and more cases coming to light on the struggle for individual rights versus the state in many Muslim countries. We can see that individuals are pushing the boundaries of expression and the states - resisting change - are pushing back.

And then of course, there is Saudi "women-still-can't-drive" Arabia. Just this past December, the government there executed a woman on the charges of sorcery. The life of Lebanese TV host was spared on similar charges after severe pressure from the international community. He spend "only" two years in jail - waiting to see if he will be executed this week or the next. And there are countless other cases like this. And no - please don't try to provide any defense for this kind of barbarity.

Now we have the case of 23-year old Hamza Kashgari. Yup 23 years old. He has just been extradited from Malaysia to Saudi Arabia - where is likely going to face execution.

Shame on Malaysia! He was trying to go to New Zealand and was arrested in transit. Initially it was reported that Interpol arrested him - but now it turns out that it was the work of just Malaysians.

Oh - wait. You might ask that he must be a dangerous criminal if he is going to be executed back in Saudi Arabia. After all, there is Facebook campaign calling for his execution. Is he a serial killer on the loose.

Well...he offended people via his tweets. He is deemed to have insulted the Prophet (PBUH). Even setting apart the fact that people can call for execution for such things in the 21st century, how must he have said in the limited twitter space? Were his tweets full of profanity?

Here are some of his offending tweets from Al-Akhbar:

Below are the controversial tweets posted by Hamza Kashgari along with their English translations. 
On your birthday, I will say that I loved the rebel in you, which always inspired me. But I didn’t like the aura of holiness, I will not bless you.On your birthday, I see you in my face everywhere I turn. I will say that I loved some things in you, hated some things, and I did not understand many other things.
On your birthday, I will not bow to you. I won’t kiss your hands. I will shake hands with you as an equal, and smile at you like you smile at me, and talk to you only as a friend, nothing more.

Burn him. Kill him. Tie him at the stake. 
An obscene number of people were killed in the witch trials from 16th-18th centuries. The estimates of witch-executions range from 40,000-60,000 people - most of them older women. I'm glad that Saudi Arabia has a low population. In addition, I doubt that the current monarchy's efforts to keep Saudi Arabia in the middle ages will last very long. Otherwise, the protectors of the Holy Land have the pre-requisites to match the brutal record of the pre-modern Europe. 
We have to stand up and raise our voice on this issue. If there is a facebook group calling for his execution - then I hope a lot lot more people can join together to eclipse these insane voices. You can at least join Save Hamza Kashgari Facebook page. If you know of a single petition place, add that in the comments.

Read More »
0 comments

Orange, Oregano, Omelet


Read More »

Guest Post: Report from a panel on Science Fiction and Islam

0 comments
This is a guest post by Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad. He is behind the website Islam and Science Fiction. He recently participated on a panel on Science Fiction and Islam at the American Cultural Association Conference, and here is his post about it.


When one thinks of Islam or Muslims Science Fiction is usually not the first thing that comes to mind. Last week I was part of a panel on Science Fiction and Islam at the South Western/ Texas American Cultural Association Conference along with Rebecca Harkins and Waheeda Deborah Bilal both of whom are studying this cultural phenomenon from an Academic perspective. My main focus was to give an overview of Science Fiction themes which have been employed by Muslims as well as how Islam and Muslims have been portrayed in Science Fiction in the Anglosphere. Before one can even begin talking about this subject the term Islam has to be delineated because Islam can refer to a religion, a set of cultures, a civilization, an ethos etc. Notice that all of these are inter-related but they are not the same. Everything which is part of the religion is not necessarily part of Islamic cultures; additionally there are things which are considered neither positive nor negative by the religion and yet they are part of the Islamic cultures. Thus the context in which this problem is to be studied is a cultural and civilizational context. In this view "Islamic" science fiction may be produced by Muslims, Christians, Jews, Rastafarians, Hindus, and even Atheists. The Islamic civilization arose in the Middle East which had a strong tradition of fantasy literature. Thus consider classics like the Arabian or 1001 nights (whose foundation was actually Hazar Afshan or Persian 1001 Nights), the Islamized Ramayan of Indonesia or the world's largest fantasy epic Tilism Hosh Ruba which is in Urdu. Many of these stories have proto-science fiction elements and cannot be called science fiction per se but it does show the capacities of their respective cultures to produce speculative fiction of high quality. However moving forward to the contemporary era we do not see science fiction to be an integral part of literature in any of the Muslim countries. That of course does not mean that science fiction has not been produced in these cultures. These range from time travel stories from 19th century Egypt, some of the earliest Feminist Science Fiction in Bengali from 1906 to Islamic Utopias set on other planets in the later half of the 20th century. Then there is a whole genre of fiction by Heterodox African American Muslim groups from the 1950s onwards which was created as a response to racial oppression. In the last decade or so both the quality and the quantity of Science Fiction coming out of the Muslim world has increased. The Islamic world has yet to produce the likes of its own Arthur Clarkes, William Gibsons, Stanlislaw Lems etc.

One good point that the audience raised, to which I only had a partial answer was that why is it that Science Fiction has not taken off in the Islamic world despite the fact that Muslim cultures themselves have a rich tradition of speculative fiction. Part of the reason is the move away from speculative literature to to more realist fiction ever since the advent of colonialism when such form of fiction was added to the list of reasons why the Muslim world had gone into decline. The second blow comes from some conservative elements of the religious community who frown upon any form of fiction as a waste of time. The net effect being that Science Fiction never really took root as an integral part of the literary culture in these countries but these things have been changing in the last two decades. Waheedah Deborah talked about the representation of Muslim women in comics which seem to oscillate between women who are totally covered in Burka or women who are almost naked as being part of the exotic East. Here one is reminded of Edward Said's critique of Orientalism that many of the motifs regarding Muslim women which were handed down to the modern world by the medieval era persist to this day. Thus the depictions of the Muslim woman are exhausted in her either being an oppressed creature waiting to be rescued or being a whore; she cannot be herself. Overall it leaves much to be desired. Rebecca Harkins who was the session chair discussed the positive and negative portrayals of Muslims in Science Fiction. The stereotypes of Muslims that prevail in the larger popular culture are also present in Science Fiction and related genres: These range from vitriolic representation of Muslims by Mack Reynolds’ in Border, Breed, nor Birth where they are incapable of civilization to Mike McQuay's Jitterberg set in a dystopian future ruled by Tyrannical Arab Muslims. The alternative history genre fares much better e.g., Donald Moffitt’s Crescent in the Sky presents a vision of an enlightened Islamic Empire spanning multiple star systems, Steven Barnes depicts an alternative North America with the roles of the Europeans and the Africans reversed but with the African Muslims having a more humane treatment of the subjugated Europeans as compared to what we see in our history. Overall the panelists agreed that there is lot of material on this subject which is out there but it has not been collected or categorized and while it is getting more notable, this genre has a long way to go.

Read More »

Just in Time for Valentine's Day!

0 comments
To read the content of this post, please click on the link below:
http://www.inspiremeasap.blogspot.com/2012/02/just-in-time-for-valentine-day.html

Read More »

Cara Mudah Mengetahui Posisi SERP

0 comments
Terkadang saya suka penasaran, entah karena narsis atau memang peduli dengan posisi SERP (Search Engine Results Page) blog ini. Ada beberapa keyword yang membuat blog ini nangkring di halaman 1 Google SERP, namun ada juga keyword yang membuat saya harus terus menerus klik "next" untuk dapat mengetahui posisi di SERP. Repot sekaligus terlalu banyak membuang waktu. Lantas saya berpikir, bagaimana
Read More »

صفقات رابحة PDF

0 comments







صيغة الملف : PDF

حجم الملف : 4 MB


رابط الحفظ


Archive

Read More »

آداب المشي الى الصلاة للشيخ محمد عبد الوهاب (رحمه الله ) PDF

0 comments



صيغة الملف : PDF

حجم الملف : 221 KB


رابط الحفظ

4shared


Read More »
0 comments

Pineapple, Pepper, Pear

Read More »

What's in the name?

0 comments
by Salman Hameed

A couple of days ago I was listening to the morning news and NPR was talking about a bombing in Nigeria. It turns out that the bombing was carried out by a extremist group - Boko Haram - and it is roughly  translated from Hausa language as "Western Education is Forbidden". Wow! Talk about specificity in names. This is not going back in time. This struggle is very much shaped by the modern world. But still, I wonder what was the discussion like when this Salafi group was thinking about their possible names? What were the other choices? How was the decision made about on this particular name?
Perhaps, this is the same sentiment in the bombings of schools by the Taliban - though, over there, the fight is also against government structures and schools are considered soft targets.

I'm in rainy rainy Portland, Oregon right now, visiting Lewis and Clark University. More later.

Read More »
0 comments

Quail, Quince, Quinoa

Read More »

Prosciutto-Wrapped Chicken Stuffed with Dried Cherries (Aphrodisiac-Amplifying Alcohol Sold Separately)

0 comments
As I mention in the opening of the video, this stuffed, prosciutto-wrapped chicken breast has everything you want in a Valentine’s Day entrée; it looks fancy, it tastes amazing, and contains dried cherries, a known aphrodisiac.

Of course, the efficacy of aphrodisiacs has been hotly debated for centuries, and while I think that some foods can have this effect, it’s virtually impossible to prove as scientific fact. One challenge with objectively analyzing the libido-leavening effects of these substances is that they’re often served alongside copious amounts of alcohol.

Would eating two-dozen oysters still turn you on, if you didn’t down all that champagne with them? Does chocolate mousse have the same effect if not preceded by a bottle of wine? I guess we could do some experiments eating these foods without drinking, but to be honest, I’m really not curious enough to do something that extreme.

Anyway, whether this delicious stuffed and rolled chicken breast helps gives your Valentine the urge to merge, or not, no one will argue that it would still make for a beautiful and romantic meal. I hope you give it a try. Enjoy!


Ingredients:
2 large boneless skinless chicken breasts
salt and pepper to taste
4 thin slices prosciutto

For the stuffing:
1/4 cup plain breadcrumbs
1/3 cup dried cherries, chopped
1 tsp freshly picked thyme leaves
1 tsp freshly minced oregano
2 cloves minced garlic
1 rounded tbsp finely grated Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese
2 tsp olive oil
1 egg yolk
salt and pepper to taste
pinch of cayenne

For optional pan sauce:
3/4 cup chicken broth
1-2 tbsp balsamic vinegar
1 tbsp cold butter
salt and pepper to taste

Read More »

المتحابين في الله لإبن قدامة PDF

0 comments


صيغة الملف : PDF


حجم الملف : 1.5 MB


رابط الحفظ


من هنا


Read More »
0 comments

Rutabaga, Rosemary, Raspberries


Read More »

Searching for American novelists about Pakistan

0 comments
by Salman Hameed

Here is a long and excellent article, The Storytellers of Empire, by Kamila Shamsie on the lack of American fiction in the post cold war era. It is actually much more than that and very incisive. She questions the lack of introspection about American involvement in the countries where it has been militarily involved (she asks of American writers. "“Your soldiers will come to our lands, but your novelists won’t.”). The article begins with Kamila's encounter with John Hersey's novel "Hiroshima" - and it here that she is talking about the two Americas:
Inevitably, it also contains within it two Americas. One is the America which develops and uses—not once, but twice—a weapon of a destructive capability which far outstrips anything that has come before, the America which decides what price some other country’s civilian population must pay for its victory. There is nothing particular to America in this—all nations in war behave in much the same way. But in the years between the bombing of Hiroshima and now, no nation has intervened militarily with as many different countries as America, and always on the other country’s soil; which is to say, no nation has treated as many other civilian populations as collateral damage as America while its own civilians stay well out of the arena of war. So that’s one of the Americas in Hiroshima—the America of brutal military power.

But there’s another America in the book, that of John Hersey. The America of looking at the destruction your nation has inflicted and telling it like it is. The America of stepping back and allowing someone else to tell their story through you because they have borne the tragedy and you have the power to bear witness to it. It is the America of The New Yorker of William Shawn, which, for the only time in its history, gave over an entire edition to a single article and kept its pages clear of its famed cartoons. It is the America which honored Hersey for his truth telling. 
I grew up in Pakistan with two Americas. One was the America of To Kill a Mockingbird and Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, of the young Michael Jackson and Laura Ingalls Wilder, of Charlie’s Angels and John McEnroe and Rob Lowe’s blue eyes. Of Martin Luther King and Snoopy. That America was exuberance and possibility.

But there was another that I lived with. The America which cozied up to Pakistan’s military dictator, Zia-ul-Haq, because it served its own interests in Afghanistan to do so. This America threw vast amounts of money at Zia, propping up his rule, strengthening his military, turning a blind eye to its nuclear program, working with him to promote the war in Afghanistan as a jihad for all Muslims rather than a territorial matter between Afghans and Soviets; this America spoke eloquently of the Afghan people’s right to freedom and self-determination but decided it was an internal matter when Zia’s government cracked down on pro-democracy protestors in Pakistan, or when he instituted public floggings and hangings, or when he passed a law which made it possible for a woman who had been raped to be stoned to death for adultery. 
How to reconcile these two Americas? I didn’t even try. It was a country I always looked at with one eye shut. With my left eye I saw the America of John Hersey; with my right eye I saw the America of the two atom bombs. This one-eyed seeing was easy enough from a distance. But then I came to America as an undergraduate and realized that with a few honorable exceptions, all of America looked at America with one eye shut.
I don’t mean Americans looked at America uncritically. I mean they looked at it merely in domestic terms. 
I hadn’t expected anyone in America to know anything about Pakistan’s cultural life in the way that I knew about America’s cultural life. In the 1980s at traffic lights in Karachi, barefoot children, many of them refugees from Afghanistan, sold paper masks of Sylvester Stallone as Rambo. As the unfortunate among you may know, Rambo III showed that great American icon fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan and was dedicated to “the brave Mujahideen fighters of Afghanistan,” though Wikipedia informs me that after 9/11 this dedication was changed to “the people of Afghanistan.” I haven’t sat through the movie to determine the veracity of this claim. But anyway, yes, you could buy paper masks of Rambo at traffic lights. And young men in the heat of the Karachi sun wore leather jackets and pushed up their sleeves in imitation of Michael Jackson. I was never foolish enough to imagine that at traffic lights in America anyone was selling paper masks of Maula Jut, Pakistan’s mustachioed cinema icon of the same period, or dancing while moving only their upper bodies in the manner of the sultry pop singer Nazia Hasan—whose below-the-waist gyrations didn’t make it past Zia-ul-Haq’s television censors. But I was startled to discover that when I said I was from Pakistan I was met with blankness—as if, in 1991, no one knew that through the 1980s Pakistan had been America’s closest ally in its proxy war against the Soviets. I don’t recall being too bothered by this. After all, it gave me a way of seeing which for a while was entirely satisfactory. 
I had grown up in a country with military rule; I had grown up, that is to say, with the understanding that the government of a nation is a vastly different thing than its people. The government of America was a ruthless and morally bankrupt entity; but the people of America, well, they were different, they were better. They didn’t think it was okay for America to talk democracy from one side of its mouth while heaping praise on totalitarian nightmares from the other side. They just didn’t know it was happening, not really, not in any way that made it real to them. For a while this sufficed. I grumbled a little about American insularity. But it was an affectionate grumble. All nations have their failings. As a Pakistani, who was I to cast stones from my brittle, blood-tipped glass house? 
Then came September 11, and for a few seconds, it brought this question: why do they hate us? 
It’s hard to remember this now, but it was a question asked loudly and genuinely, maybe not everywhere, certainly not by everyone, but by enough people. It was asked not only about the men on the planes but also about those people in the world who didn’t fall over with weeping but instead were seen to remark that now America, too, knew what it felt like to be attacked. It was asked, and very quickly it was answered: they hate our freedoms. And just like that a door was closed and a large sign pasted onto it saying, “You’re Either With Us or Against Us.” Anyone who hammered on the door with mention of the words “foreign policy” was accused of justifying the murder of more than three thousand people. 
In this moment of darkness, I found myself looking to my tribe, my people. I found myself looking to writers. Where were the novels that could be proffered to people who asked, “Why do they hate us?”, which is actually the question “Who are these people and what do they have to do with us?” No such novel, as far as I knew, had come from the post-Cold War generation of writers who started writing after the 1980s when Islam replaced Communism as the terrifying Other. But that would change, I told myself. The nation that had intervened militarily with more nations than any other in the latter half of the twentieth century but had itself come under attack infrequently would now see its stories bound up with the stories of other places. The writers would write. The novels would come.
They didn’t. They haven’t.
This is just the beginning of the essay. If you have time, you should definitely read the full article. Towards the end, she talks about some of the novels written by Pakistani writers about 9/11. But where are the American novelists:
The stories of America in the World rather than the World in America stubbornly remain the domain of nonfiction. Your soldiers will come to our lands, but your novelists won’t. The unmanned drone hovering over Pakistan, controlled by someone in Langley, is an apt metaphor for America’s imaginative engagement with my nation. 
But what about the Joppolos of fiction writing? Listen again to Hersey’s remarks about Joppolo and imagine he’s talking about fiction writers rather than soldiers: “No other country has such a fund of men who speak the languages of the lands we must invade, who understand the ways and have listened to their parents sing the folk songs and have tasted the wine of the land on the palate of their memories. This is a lucky thing for America. We are very lucky to have our Joppolos.” 
Where is Joppolo the novelist? Where is the American writer who looks on his or her country with two eyes, one shaped by the experience of living here, the other filled with the sad knowledge of what this country looks like when it’s not at home. Where is the American writer who can tell you about the places your nation invades or manipulates, brings you into those stories and lets you draw breath with its characters?
... 
In some cases, those of us writing about America have lived and studied here. But that’s not true in all cases; it’s not true of Mohammad Hanif and Nadeem Aslam. 
So why is it, please explain, that you’re in our stories but we’re not in yours? 
Fear of appropriation? I think that argument can only take you so far. Surely fiction writers today understand the value of stories about America In the World, and can see through the appropriation argument. It is, after all, a political argument that can easily be trumped by another political argument about the importance of engagement. So why, then—why, when there are astonishing stories out in the world about America, to do with America, going straight to the heart of the question: who are these people and what do they have to do with us?—why are the fiction writers staying away from the stories? The answer, I think, comes from John Hersey. He said of novelists, “A writer is bound to have varying degrees of success, and I think that that is partly an issue of how central the burden of the story is to the author’s psyche.”

And that’s the answer. Even now, you just don’t care very much about us. One eye remains closed. The pen, writing its deliberate sentences, is icy cold.
Read the full article here

Read More »
0 comments

Swiss Chard, Sieve, Sifter


Read More »

Pizza Sauce – Let’s Play ‘Hide the Little Fish’

0 comments
I can assure you that the anchovies in this pizza sauce recipe are there for the subtle saltiness and unique savoriness they provide, and not just so you can tell your friend (the one who really hates anchovies) that they just ate some. Could it be for both? Sure.

This pizza sauce recipe represents a new and improved version of the one we posted way back in 2007. We snuck in some of the aforementioned fish, and we’re also using both fresh and dried oregano. I love this sauce. If there’s a tastier, all-purpose pizza sauce recipe out there, I haven’t tried it.

Convention wisdom says that great pizza is all about the crust. Which is certainly a huge factor, but if you were given the choice between a great crust topped with a bad sauce, and a grocery store crust made with a delicious, world-class sauce, which would you prefer?

Texture aside, no mater how they're combined, flour, water, and yeast can only taste so bad. But, a terrible sauce can actually make a slice of pizza inedible. I can’t remember ever not eating a piece of pizza because the crust was so awful, but I've given up after biting into an inferior sauce before.

Of course, around these parts the argument is completely academic since we’ve not only provided you with a plan for perfect sauce, but given you several great pizza dough recipes, like our famous no-knead pizza dough, as well as the venerable Wolfgang Puck California-style dough recipe. I hope you make pizza soon. Enjoy!


Ingredients (makes about 3 cups):
3 tbsp olive oil
2 anchovy filets
4 cloves garlic, minced
2 tbsp chopped fresh oregano
1/4 tsp red pepper flakes, or to taste
1/4 tsp dried oregano
1 can (28 oz) whole peeled “San Marzano” tomatoes
salt and pepper to taste
1/2 tsp sugar
very small pinch baking soda

Read More »

لأول مرة :الحج المبرور ( معلومات مهمة عن الحج و العمرة )

0 comments




الكُتيب من مرفوعاتي فمن وجد في تنسيقه أي خلل فليتفضل مشكوراً بالاشارة اليه

صيغة الملف : PDF

حجم الملف : 7 MB

رابط الحفظ


من هنا

Read More »

Muhammad(SAW) name written on a Tree

0 comments
Islamic Miracle, Muhammad(SAW) name written on a Tree

Read More »

Lecture Video: Robert Hazen - The Scientific Quest for Life's Origins

0 comments
by Salman Hameed

This was a fantastic lecture on one of the key areas of science-religion interactions. I actually agree with Robert Hazen that the question of origin(s) of life, while unresolved as yet, is a purely scientific question. He does a fantastic job of showing the break-down of different steps on the way from chemistry to biology on ancient Earth. The definite is not there yet, but the blueprint for investigation is there.

Here is the video and below is the Q and A. Apologies for the relatively dark video. We messed up on the video quality this time :(



And the Q&A:




Read More »
0 comments

Tumeric, Tangerine, Tomatoes


Read More »

Black Magic Cake - Crazy Cooking Challenge

0 comments

It's time for this month's Crazy Cooking Challenge and this month's theme is Chocolate Cake!  I knew it would'nt be hard to find delicious chocolate cake recipes around my favorite blogs and I was right!  The recipe I decided to make, Black Magic Cake sounded perfect for this challenge.  It's a super dark, moist cake that looked irresitable.  I found this cake recipe on a great blog....My Baking Addiction and I couldn't wait to try it myself.  The frosting recipe I found on a local message board and gave it a try, I think it went pretty well with the cake....it may have been a little too sweet but overall the cake was a hit.


Ingredients:

2 cups sugar
1 3/4 cups all-purpose flour
3/4 cup HERSHEY’S Cocoa
2 teaspoons baking soda
1 teaspoon baking powder
1 teaspoon salt
2 eggs
1 cup buttermilk or *sour milk
1 cup strong black coffee OR 2 teaspoons powdered instant coffee plus 1 cup boiling water
1/2 cup vegetable oil
1 teaspoon vanilla extract

* To sour milk: Use 1 tablespoon white vinegar plus milk to equal 1 cup

Heat oven to 350°F. Grease and flour two 9-inch round baking pans or one 13x9x2-inch baking pan.  Stir together sugar, flour, cocoa, baking soda, baking powder and salt in large bowl. Add eggs, buttermilk, coffee, oil and vanilla; beat on medium speed of mixer 2 minutes (batter will be thin). Pour batter evenly into prepared pans.  Bake 30 to 35 minutes for round pans, 35 to 40 minutes for rectangular pan or until wooden pick inserted in center comes out clean.  Cool 10 minutes; remove from pans to wire racks. Cool completely. Frost as desired.

Chocolate Cream Frosting

4 1/3 cups plus 2 Tbs. unsifted powdered sugar
1 pinch salt
4 oz. unsweetened chocolate -- melted and cooled to tepid
1 1/2 oz. bittersweet chocolate -- melted and cooled to tepid
6 Tbs. unsalted butter -- cut into tablespoon chunks and softened
3/4 cups plus 3 Tbs. heavy cream
2 1/4 tsp. pure vanilla extract

Place powdered sugar and salt in large bowl. Add the melted chocolates, butter, cream, and vanilla. Using an electric hand mixer, beat for 1 minute on low to combine ingredients; continue beating on high for 2 more minutes or until very smooth and creamy, scraping down the sides of the mixing bowl several times with a rubber spatula to keep the frosting even textured. The frosting should be thick but creamy; if it seems too dense, lighten it with a little more heavy cream, added a tsp. at a time. Use frosting immediately.

Makes about 3 3/4 cups frosting


Read More »

Talhah ibn Ubaydullah (Islamic Article)

0 comments
Talhah ibn Ubaydullah
This article appeared in Hudaa magazine, November 1995. Hudaa is being published on the Web - check it at www.qss.org/publications/hudaa/list.html

Returning to Makkah in haste after a trading trip to Syria, Talhah asked his family, "Did anything happen in Makkah since we left?"  "Yes," they replied.  "Muhammad ibn Abdullah emerged alleging that he is a Prophet and Abu Quhafah (Abu Bakr) has followed him."
"I used to know Abu Bakr," said Talhah.  "He is an easy-going, amiable, gentle man.  He was an honest and upright trader.  We were quite fond of him and loved sitting in his company because of his knowledge of Quraysh history and genealogy."
Later, Talhah went to Abu Bakr and asked, "Is it true what they say, that Muhammad ibn Abdullah has appeared as a Prophet and that you follow him?"  "Yes," replied Abu Bakr, and went on to tell Talhah about Muhammad and what a good thing it would be if he too followed him.  Talhah in turn told Abu Bakr the story of his strange recent encounter with an ascetic in the market-place of Busra in Syria.  The ascetic is said to have told Talhah that someone called "Ahmad" would appear in Makkah about that time and that he would be the last of the Prophets.  He also told Talhah, so the story goes, that the Prophet would leave the sacred precincts of Makkah and migrate to a land of black soil, water and palm trees.
Abu Bakr was astonished by the story and took Talhah to Muhammad.  The Prophet, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, explained Islâm to Talhah and recited some portions of the Qur'ân to him.  Talhah was enthusiastic.  He related to the Prophet his conversation with the ascetic of Busra. There and then, Talhah pronounced the shahaadah - that there is no deity worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allaah.  He was the fourth person who had been introduced to Islaam by Abu Bakr.
The Quraysh were astounded by the young Talhah's acceptance of Islâm.  The one who was most dismayed and unhappy was his mother.  She had hoped that he would one day be a leader in his community because of his noble character and his outstanding virtues.  Some of the Quraysh, anxious and worried, went to Talhah as soon as they could to wean him away from his new religion but found him as firm and unshakeable as a rock.  When they despaired of using gentle persuasion to achieve their aim, they resorted to persecution and violence.  The following story is related by Mas'ood ibn Kharash:
"While I was making saiy between as-Safa and al-Marwa, there appeared a crowd of people pushing a young man whose hands were tied behind his back.  As they rushed behind him, they rained down blows on his head.  In the crowd was an old woman who lashed him repeatedly and shouted abuses at him.  I asked, 'What's the matter with this young man?'
'This is Talhah ibn Ubaydullah.  He gave up his religion and now follows the Banu Hashim man.'
'And who is the woman behind him?' I asked.
'She is as-Sabah bint al-Hadrami, the young man's mother,' they said.
"The Quraysh did not stop there. Nawfal ibn Khuwaylid, nicknamed the 'lion of the Quraysh', bound Talhah with a rope and with the same rope he tied up Abu Bakr and then handed them over to the mindless and violent mob of Makkah to be beaten and tortured.  The shared experience no doubt drew Talhah and Abu Bakr closer together! Years passed and events of great significance took place.  Talhah grew in stature as he bore the pain and suffering of being tested in the path of Allaah, the Most Great and His Prophet, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam.  He gained the unique reputation among Muslims of being 'the living martyr'.  The Prophet, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, also called him 'Talhah the Good' and 'Talhah the Generous'.
The name of 'the living martyr' was earned during the Battle of Uhud.  Talhah had missed the Battle of Badr.  He and Said ibn Zayd had been sent outside Madinah on a mission by the Prophet and when they returned, the Prophet and his companions were already on the way back from Badr. They were both sad at having missed the opportunity of taking part in the first campaign with the Prophet but were tremendously pleased when he told them they would get the same reward as those who actually fought.
At the Battle of Uhud, when the Muslims fell into disarray at the beginning of hostilities, the Prophet became dangerously exposed.  There were about eleven men of the Ansar at his side and one Muaajir: Talhah ibn Ubaydullaah.  The Prophet, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, shouted, "The one who repulses these people from us will be my companion in Paradise."
"I will, O Messenger of Allaah," shouted Talhah.
"No, stick to your position," replied the Prophet.  A man from the Ansar volunteered and the Prophet agreed.  He fought until he was killed.  The Prophet went further up the mountain with the mushrikeen still in close pursuit. "Isn't there someone to combat them?" he asked.  Talhah again volunteered but the Prophet ordered him to maintain his position.  Another person immediately came forward, fought and was killed.  This continued until everyone who stood by the Prophet was martyred except Talhah.
"Now, yes," signalled the Prophet, and Talhah went into battle.  By this time, the Prophet's tooth had been broken, his forehead slashed, his lips wounded and blood was streaming down his face.  He was drained of energy. Talhah plunged into the enemy and pushed them away from the Prophet.  He turned back to the Prophet and helped him a little further up the mountain and put him to lie on the ground.  He then renewed his attack and successfully repulsed the enemy.  About this occasion Abu Bakr said, "At that moment, Abu Ubayda ibn al-Jarrah and I were far from the Prophet.  When we came close to him to render assistance to him, the Prophet said, 'Leave me and go to your companion (meaning Talhah).'"
There was Talhah, bleeding profusely.  He had numerous wounds, from sword, spear and arrow.  His foot had been cut and he had fallen into a hollow where he lay unconscious.
Thereafter, the Prophet, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, said, "Whoever would like to see a man still walking on earth who has completed his span (of life), let him look at Talhah ibn Ubaydullah."
And, whenever Uhud was recalled, Abu Bakr as-Siddiq, raddi Allaahu anhu, would say, "That day, that entire day, belonged to Talhah."
That was the story of how Talhah earned the title of 'the living martyr'.  There were innumerable incidents which led to him being called 'Talhah the Good' and 'Talhah the Generous'.
Talhah was an astute and successful merchant who travelled widely to the north and south of the Arabian peninsula.  It is said that after one of his trips to Hadramawt, he had profits amounting to some seven hundred thousand dirhams.  His nights would be anxious and worried on account of this vast wealth.  On one such night, his wife, Umm Kulthum the daughter of Abu Bakr, said to him, "What's wrong with you, O Abu Muhammad?  Perhaps I have done something to hurt you?"
"No," replied Talhah.  "You are a wonderful wife for a Muslim man.  But I have been thinking since last night: how can a man think of his Lord and Sustainer when he goes to sleep with this wealth in his house?"
"Why should it bother you so much?" enquired Umm Kulthum.  "What about all the needy ones in your community and all your friends?  When you get up in the morning share it out among them."
"May Allaah bless you.  You are really marvellous, the daughter of a marvellous man," said Talhah to his wife.  In the morning, Talhah gathered up the money in bags and distributed it among the poor Muhaajireen and Ansar.
It is related that a man came up to Talhah requesting help and also mentioning some common family connection between them both.  "This family connection has been mentioned to me before," said Talhah who was in fact known for his generosity to all members of his clan.  Talhah told the man that he had just sold a piece of land to Uthman ibn Affan for several thousand dirhams.  The man could have the money or the land which could be re-purchased from Uthman.  The man opted for the money and Talhah gave it all to him.
Talhah was well-known for helping people who had debt problems, heads of families who experienced hardship, and widows.  One of his friends, as-Saib ibn Zayd, said of him, "I accompanied Talhah ibn Ubaydullah on journeys and I stayed with him at home, and I have not found anyone who was more generous with money, clothes and food than Talhah."  No wonder he was called 'Talhah the Good' and 'Talhah the Generous'!
The name Talhah is also connected with the first fitnah of civil war among Muslims after the death of the Prophet, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam.  The seeds of trouble were sown during the caliphate of Uthman ibn Affan.  There were many complaints and accusations against Uthman.  Some mischief-makers were not content with accusations alone, but were determined to finish him off.  In the year 35 AH (656 CE) a group of insurgents stormed Uthman's house and murdered him while he was reading the Qur'ân.  It was one of the most shocking events in the early history of Islâm.
Alee was persuaded to accept the responsibility of the Caliphate and all Muslims swore allegiance to him, including Talhah and Zubayr ibn al-Awwam.  Talhah and Zubayr were deeply shocked by the murder of Uthman.  They were horrified and felt strongly that the murderers should be punished and that justice should be done.  But the punishment of the murderers was not an easy task in as much as the crime was not just the work of a few individuals but involved a large number of persons.
Talhah and Zubayr sought Ali's permission to go to Makkah to perform Umrah.  They met Aishah the wife of the Prophet, raddi Allaahu anha.  She was greatly shocked when she heard of the assassination of Uthman.  From Makkah, Talhah, Zubayr and Aishah set off for Basrah where large numbers were gathering to seek revenge for the death of Uthman.
The forces gathered at Basrah seemed to present an open challenge to Alee.  As the caliph of the Muslims and the head of the entire Muslim State, he could not tolerate any insurrection or armed revolt against the State.  But what a difficult and awesome task he faced!  To deal with the revolt, he had to confront his brothers, his companions and his friends-followers of the Prophet and his religion, those who often fought side by side with him against the forces of shirk, those whom he respected and loved.
The forces clamouring for vengeance for Uthman and those supporting Alee met at a place called Kuraybah, near Basrah.  Alee desired to avoid war and settle matters by peaceful means.  He used every means at his disposal to achieve peace.  He clung to every hope of avoiding confrontation.  But the dark forces at work against Islâm, and how numerous they were, were determined that matters should come to a terrible and bloody end.
Alee wept bitterly when he saw Aishah, the 'Mother of the Believers', in her hawdaj (palanquin) astride a camel at the head of the army which now emerged to fight him. And when he saw Talhah and Zubayr, two close companions of the Prophet, in the midst of the army, he shouted to them to come out to him. They did so and Alee said to Talhah, "O Talhah, have you come with the wife of the Messenger of Allaah to fight along with her..?"  And to Zubayr he said, "O Zubayr, I implore you, by Allaah, do you remember the day when the Prophet, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, passed by you and we were in such-and-such place and he asked you 'Do you love Alee?' and you said 'Why shouldn't I love my cousin and one who follows my religion'..?"
Alee continued talking to them, reminding them of the bonds of brotherhood and faith.  In the end both Talhah and Zubayr withdrew from participation in this civil war. They withdrew immediately when they saw the situation in a different light.  But they paid for that withdrawal with their lives.
As they withdrew, a man named Amr ibn Jarmouz followed Zubayr and cowardly murdered him while he performed Salah. Talhah was killed by an arrow allegedly shot by Marwan - a cousin of Uthman who was too blinded by rage and the desire to seek revenge for his kinsman to respond to the possibility of avoiding war and bloodshed among Muslims.
The murder of Uthman had become Talhah's tryst with destiny.  He did not participate in the fighting and killing that followed, that came to be known in history as the Battle of the Camel.  Indeed, if he had known that the fitnah would have degenerated into such insane hatred and bitterness, and resulted in such a bloody outcome, he would have resisted it.  He was not keen to fight Alee.  He was simply appalled by the murder of Uthman and wanted to see justice done.  Before the beginning of the battle he had said in a voice choked with emotion: "O Lord, for the sake of Uthman, take from me this day until You are pleased."  Then when Alee faced him and Zubayr, they saw the correctness of his position and withdrew from the field of battle.  Nevertheless, in these difficult circumstances, martyrdom was reserved for them.
The Battle of the Camel came to an end.  Aishah, the Mother of the Believers, realized that she had precipitated matters and left Basrah for the Sacred Masjid, and then to Madinah, distancing herself from the conflict.  Alee provided well for her journey giving her all the comfort and honour due to her.
When the numerous dead from the battle were brought together, Alee led the funeral prayer for them all, those who supported him and those who fought him.  When he had finished burying Talhah and Zubayr he bade farewell to them with a heavy heart, a heart filled with tenderness and love.  "I really hope," he said in simple and sublime words, "that Talhah, az-Zubayr, Uthman and I will be among those of whom Allaah has said, 'And We shall remove from their hearts any lurking sense of injury and rancour; they will be brothers joyfully facing each other on thrones of dignity.' [Qur'an, al-Hijr:47]"
Then he looked tenderly and sorrowfully on the graves of his brothers in faith and said, "I have heard with these two ears of mine the Messenger of Allaah, may Allaah bless him and grant him peace, saying, 'Talhah and az- Zubayr are my companions in Paradise!'"

Read More »