Gorgonzola Cream Sauce – Now with Cream!

Since we’re heading into rich and creamy sauce season, I thought I’d use a nice hunk of Gorgonzola as an excuse to post a tutorial for a classic “cream sauce.” 

Unlike what’s passed off as the real stuff at casual dining chains, a true cream sauce contains nothing but heavy cream, and is on another level when it comes to taste and texture. A regular diet of cream sauce isn’t recommended, but once in a while, it’s nice to take a break from the old 2%, and the technique is dead simple. Simmer cream in a saucepan until it reduces and thickens slightly, flavor it however, and toss in some hot (hopefully stuffed) pasta. Done and done.

I went with a fairly mild, crumbly Gorgonzola this time, but no matter which you choose, be careful not to “cook” the cheese. You just want to stir it in on low, until it’s almost gone, and then turn off the heat. Otherwise the cheese will “break,” and you’ll have a greasy mess.

Since my mini-ravioli delivery system featured a squash filling, I decided to finish with diced apples and toasted walnuts. It was perfect with the rich sauce, and I recommend it if you’re using a similar pasta. Since the sauce itself is so easy, as in one ingredient easy, you can spend all that extra brainpower thinking of things you can add to it. I hope you give this great sauce technique a try soon. Enjoy!


Ingredients for 2 large or 4 smaller portions:
1 cup heavy whipping cream (36% fat)
salt and pepper to taste
cayenne to taste
3 ounces Gorgonzola cheese, crumbled
2 tbsp chopped Italian parsley
finely grated Parmigiano-Reggiano, optional
6 ounces dry mini-ravioli (double to 12-oz if using fresh ravioli or tortellini)
1/2 apple, diced
1/4 cup chopped toasted walnuts

0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Seventy-Fifth Anniversary of Orson Welles' War of the Worlds Broadcast

by Salman Hameed

Today marks the 75th anniversary of the radio broadcast about Martian invasion that spooked many (how many?) Americans in 1938. Below is pretty good American Experience episode that provides the background on the panic and on the genius of Orson Welles. I do think that the word "genius" is quite appropriate for Welles, as he transformed theater, radio, and then movies - all before the age of 26! He is the Einstein of the entertainment industry. Okay - I digress.

But while you watch the show, also read this Slate article that claims that the stories of widespread panic following the broadcast are a myth, created by the newspapers, and they criticize this PBS documentary as well. I think they have a compelling argument for reducing the size of the myth, but I think the documentary is more than just about the panic, and presents a broader cultural context as well as caveats in estimates about the freakouts. One thing I did not like in the documentary: Actors performing actual comments from listeners at the time. Annoying and distracting. The real story is so good that you don't need gimmicks to keep viewers' attention.

You can also listen to the original radio broadcast on OpenCulture, where they have also included the video of a press conference following the panic - and it contains an amusingly brilliant performance by Orson Welles.

Here is American Experience - War of the Worlds (it is about an hour long).


0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Lesson 142: Storing Honey Supers Over The Winter www.honeybeesonline.com 217-427-2678

DavidSheri

Hello everyone! We’re David and Sheri Burns at Long Lane Honey Bee Farms located in central Illinois. Today’s beekeeping lesson focuses on correctly handling your honey supers over the winter. But, before we get started, let me invite you to join Jon Zawislak and me for our next beekeeping radio program this Wednesday night, Oct. 30th, starting at 6:30 central time. It’s fun and you can ask us any beekeeping question you can think of. This week, we’ll be looking at the pros and cons of different hives such as the Langstroth, Warre and Top Bar. We’ll through in some humor. You can call in and join us live, here’s how:

The number to call is: 1-724-444-7444. This week we'll be discussing pros and cons of different types of hives. To join our show, you'll be asked to enter our SHOW ID which is: 129777 followed by the # sign. Then the automated system will ask you for your Pin number which 1 followed by the # sign. At that point, you'll be on the show with us so you can ask your questions. You will be muted unless you press * 8 on your phone and that will allow us to unmute you so you can ask your question. Call in around 10 minutes prior to broadcast, at 6:20 p.m. central time. The show starts this coming Wednesday night at 6:30 p.m. central time. If you want to just listen from your computer, go to: http://www.talkshoe.com/tc/129777

If you don't call in, Jon and I will make a shameful attempt to be entertaining! Help us out!! If you use a smart phone you can add the Podcast App and have our shows sent to your mobile device every time we produce a new one. Just go to iTunes and search for Hive Talk, scroll down to podcast and you'll find us there.
Or listen to our past episodes by clicking here or by copying the link below and pasting it into your internet browser. http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=129777&cmd=tc

shipping We have added some new helpers! Leah has been added to our shipping department. Leah is engaged to our middle son, Seth who is serving as a marine in Afghanistan. I think I’ve told you before about Zach. The beekeeping year is already starting off with a blaze of interest and purchases of hives and it’s only October! This is great and we are doing our best to keep up with the overwhelming enthusiasm over our hives and Winter-Bee-Kinds.

Sheri and I have finished our beekeeping classes for 2013 and we are plotting out the calendar for 2014. People are already calling to book seats for our upcoming 2014 classes, but we need a little time to think through the schedule. Also, we are being flooded with phone calls for our packages of bees. We do not post dates or prices for our packages until Jan. Keep watching our blogs and website for updates.

winterbkind As winter quickly approaches, we hope you’ve heard about our Winter-Bee-Kind board. This board provides insulation at the top of the hive to reduce the contrast of cold temperatures outside the hive and warmer temperatures inside the hive. This greatly reduces the condensation that often develops above the winter cluster and causes cold water to drip down on the bees. Plus, the board is filled with carbohydrates, protein and Honey-B-Healthy. That’s not all! The board also provides an upper vent to help reduce stale, moist air from the winter hive as well as giving the hive an exit that is closer to the cluster for the much needed winter cleansing flight. This is our third year to produce these Winter-Bee-Kind candy boards and not only is their overwhelming enthusiasm from new beekeepers wanting to purchase this product, but returning customers are buying more. To make your purchase CLICK HERE or go to: http://www.honeybeesonline.com/servlet/Categories?category=Feeders

Check out our Video on our Winter-Bee-Kind: http://youtu.be/7sDXqd4DcKc

LESSON 142: Storing Honey Supers Over Winter

By now your honey supers have been removed from your hive and I hope you had a good honey crop this year. But what’s the best way to store these supers over winter.

1. If possible, try and freeze your supers prior to storage. Wax moths and small hive beetle can lay eggs in the supers that are not noticeable to the naked eye. If you fail to freeze the supers prior to storage, under the right conditions, these eggs can hatch and your supers can be destroyed. Freezing kills all stages of egg, larva and adults. A chest freezer works nice because it can hold several full supers at a time. I usually keep the supers in the freezer for 2 days.

2. Moth balls are no longer recommended to use on honey supers. A similar product (PDB) is often considered to fumigate the supers against wax moths, but it does not kill eggs. Please read safety labels on any product you use and make a wise decision about using chemicals on your supers where honey is produced.

3. DO NOT store empty honey supers on the hive for winter. This may fool the winter cluster to move up into an empty food source. Also cluster heat will rise up and away from the cluster into the super. If you do overwinter a filled super above the cluster be sure to remove the queen excluder so the queen can go where the warm cluster goes.

4. After freezing your supers you can store them in a room which is free of mice and other pests. You can store them outside in a short column in colder climates, but be sure all cracks between and around boxes are sealed to prevent mice from making this into a high rise apartment.

Thanks for joining us today for another lesson in beekeeping and we hope these pointers were helpful. Be sure and join us tonight at 6:30 on our call in, live, radio program on beekeeping and we’d love to take your questions tonight. Our program is about various types of hives, but ask any question you want. Information on how to join our call tonight is located at the top of this lesson.

That’s all for now and thank you for joining us for another beekeeping lesson! Please let others know about these lessons and our business. We appreciate you spreading the word! 

Thank you!
David and Sheri Burns
Long Lane Honey Bee Farms
217-427-2678 Website: www.honeybeesonline.com

 facebooktwitter iconYoutube


0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Song: Samuel Tells of the Baby Jesus

I love this Christmas song!  I think I will either save these images to my iPad and use it as a flip chart or connect it to a larger screen as we learn this song.



Said Samuel, "Within five years, a night will be as day,"


"And Baby Jesus will be born in a land far, far away."


Hosanna!  Hosanna!  Oh, let us gladly sing.


How blessed that our Lord was born; let earth receive her King!


Across the sea, in Bethlehem, Lord Jesus came to earth


As Samuel had prophesied, and angels sang His birth.


Hosanna!  Hosanna!  Oh, let us gladly sing.


How blessed that our Lord was born; let earth receive her King!






0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Happy National Chocolate Day!

According to Twitter, today is National Chocolate Day, and to celebrate I'm re-posting one of my all-time favorite ways to enjoy this ancient pleasure, the Savory Chocolate Sea Salt Crostini. You can read the original post here, but to summarize, these are awesome. Enjoy!


0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Cranberry Pomegranate Martini

Thanksgiving is right around the corner or for many of us Thanksgivukkuh.  So here come some great recipes and ideas for our favorite two holidays!!
 
Every Thanksgiving my sisters and I like to create a new signatiure drink befitting of the season.  Susan found a recipe for cranberry simple syrup, picked up some pomegranate vodka and we were set.  As a granish we skewered whole cranberries on a drink pick and froze them.  It was a great extra touch and it really did make a good stirrer that kept our drinks cool. 
 
 
Cranberry Simple Syrup
Ingredients:
2 1/4 cups fresh or frozen cranberries (8 ounces)      
1 cup sugar
1 cup water
 
Preparation:
In a medium saucepan, bring cranberries, sugar, and water to a simmer over medium. Reduce heat to medium-low and cook until cranberries are tender but haven't burst, 10 minutes. Let cool, then strain through a fine-mesh sieve. Discard cranberries.  Pour simple syrup in a small pitcher and reserve in the refrigerator until cocktail time.
 
Cranberry Pomegranate Martini
Ingredients:
1 oz Cranberry Simple Syrup
4 oz Pomegranate Vodka
ice
whole fresh cranberries skewered on a tooth pick or short skewer
 
Preparation:
Fill a cocktail shaker or anther container with ice.  Pour in 1oz of premade cranberry simple syrup and 4oz of pomegranate vodka.  Put on lid and shake for 15 seconds until nice and chilled.  Pour alcohol mixture without ice into a glass and add cranberry skewer for garnish.
 
 

0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Wisdom from Hyper-growth Companies

Guest post by Lisa Regan, writer for The Lean Startup Conference.

Last week, we hosted a webcast conversation, Lean Startup for Growing Companies, with Eric Ries, Wyatt Jenkins of Shutterstock, and Ari Gesher of Palantir. The discussion focused on companies that have hit product-market fit and are growing fast—a topic for advanced entrepreneurs. But the information was critical for any early-stage company that hopes to reach that critical point and wants to be prepared when it comes. We’d like to share some highlights from the webcast and invite you to watch it in its entirety. There’s great information here about hiring, team structure, and best practices that will make you smarter.

About Ari and Wyatt: Wyatt Jenkins is VP of Product at Shutterstock, a stock photo site founded in 2003 that now encompasses twelve cross-functional teams and is one of the world’s largest two-sided marketplaces. Ari Gesher is a senior engineer at Palantir Technologies, creating data-mining software for government and financial clients. Palantir, founded in 2004, had 15 employees when Ari started there; it now has over 1,000 employees and undisclosed revenues reported to be approaching $1B. Wyatt and Ari will both be speaking at The Lean Startup Conference in December.

The first topic that came up is one that people in younger companies will want to know about—what’s hyper-growth actually like? What would it help to know about it before it happens?

Ari: “Having been through hyper-growth or exponential growth, you hear about these other organizations that have been through that and you look at your Googles and your Facebooks and you sort of knew them when they were smaller, and you see them as these behemoths. And what you don’t realize is that there’s almost no graceful way to go through that kind of growth. It’s painful no matter what. We had a year where we doubled size from around 400 to 800, and so you end this year where you have half the company’s been there for less than a year. And all the old ways of doing things are busting at their seams…. It’s a good problem to have. It means that hiring’s working, the business is working – but when you’re going at that speed and that growth, I think it’s something humans just weren’t even built for…. It’s going to be painful. And if there’s one lesson to take away, I guess it’s, ‘Know that it’s going to be painful, and don’t be afraid that that means you’re doing something wrong.’”

Wyatt: “There’s a certain point at which all the things you didn’t want to have to do when you started a company, you now not only have to do, but you have to do them well. You have to really know how to run a meeting, to keep it efficient and keep people wanting to go and be productive. You have to get really good at onboarding practices and the things that when you started a company you thought, I don’t want to do any of that, I just want to build stuff. But now suddenly all those soft skills become the key to your organization.”

Another portion of the conversation centered on the role Lean Startup techniques usually associated with smaller companies can have in a scaling business— specifically, a Five Whys (a technique for discovering the root causes of a failure, which Eric explains in detail in the webcast) and testing.

Ari: “We started doing Five Whys when we were I’d say probably around 100 people. And at that point I might argue you maybe don’t even need it. But it’s important to get it to start being part of the culture, because the point at which you need it is when you’re bigger, when you have a lot of complexity in the way the organization interacts, and the whole point of asking ‘why’ five times is that you’re going to come up with some really surprising results that have to do with everybody doing what they thought was right, but because of the way information doesn’t really flow or process interlocks… the problem is actually four or five layers deeper than where you thought it was. And that only happens at scale.”

Wyatt: “I think testing culture is one of the most important parts of keeping yourself Lean as you scale. And the reason is that people have a direct connection to results without having to go up and down the chain of command. When I meet companies that are struggling a lot with hierarchy or struggling with bureaucracy, a lot of the time the data and results about things are trapped in pockets of the organization and other parts of the organization have to fight to get at it. But if you have a true testing culture, whenever somebody says something in a meeting like, ‘I think X,’ and someone else goes, ‘That’s a nice hypothesis. Let’s go try that out,’ I think that healthy level of testing keeps you lean, it keeps you close to the customer, and that’s one of the things that I think helps us a lot – testing.

Hiring, recruiting, and training (or perhaps fostering – the correct term to use was hard to settle on) played a big role in this conversation. Having more employees doesn’t mean that each hire is less important – it means that the processes around hiring need to develop to meet the company’s needs. But those are constantly changing. So what goes into acquiring and supporting the best employees?

Wyatt: “One thing I try to avoid is dogmatism. If somebody’s really into a process, like really, really into it, to where they’re inflexible, they’re probably not ready for a hyper-growth organization, because whatever it is you’re dogmatic about, it ain’t gonna work in another six months. So when I see that dogmatism I immediately recognize that, wow, this person’s going to have trouble when we’re a completely different company in a year. I always like to look back at my own job and say, you know, I’m doing a completely different job today than I was a year ago, and the year before that, and the year before that. That’s hyper-growth. And in hyper-growth, I promise you whatever you hold near and dear will be incorrect – soon.”

Ari: “You can’t train people to have a different mindset…. The important thing to do as leaders is bring in priming, to give people permission to be uncomfortable. To say, hey, we’re gonna go through this, and some stuff’s gonna be broken, don’t freak out. It’s when they’re not ready for it, when they’re not aware that that doesn’t mean that there’s actually anything existentially wrong, [that you have a problem]….. The psychological effect of priming is really important. If you give people a framework on which to hang their experiences before they encounter them, it makes it much easier for them to digest them and understand them as they encounter [them].”

Though a company may expand from two to 2,000, Eric, Wyatt and Ari all agreed on the importance of maintaining a structure of small, cross-functional teams, rather than siloed divisions (for more on that, see our last webcast on Lean Startup in the Enterprise).

Wyatt: “We’re still in love with the ‘two-pizza team’…just in general if it takes more than two pizzas to feed the team, the team’s too big. We like our teams to be small, relatively autonomous, very autonomous in some cases, depending on the kind of work they’re doing. We treat the teams like startups, we like that ‘us against the world’ mentality of small, autonomous teams.”  And, later: “I don’t think we can say that enough: Let the product team figure out what they’re building. If you’re trying to micro-manage that on a high level, across lots of teams, you’re not smart enough [to pull it off], I promise. You really have to point into a direction, have a few high-level metrics, and let your teams fill in the gaps, let them be autonomous. That was a big lesson for me, at least.”

Ari, on creating community while maintaining multiple teams: “We foster all kinds of extra-curricular activities, everything from people doing tabletop games to sponsoring a team in a basketball league to having video game rooms. A lot of these things exist here and they may look like perks…but they’re actually about building the non-obvious links, the non-formal links between teams to really start to create a community. And I think everything you can do to invest in making that place – a business – actually a community, where people live their lives and meet each other, and have a lot of trust – that goes a long way toward making the company feel smaller. And then you get people to be able to lean on those relationships. So maybe you have a team of five people that work close together, and you need something from another team, and one person, well they play Halo together after dinner. And so it’s easy to have that conversation, to break through that ‘stranger barrier’ you get at scale.”

Finally, some last words of wisdom from Eric on the basics of creating a culture of experimentation:

Eric: "People listening in, you’re hearing a lot of cultural and practical tips that are applicable to the stage of company that these guys are at now, and I’m trying to throw in my two cents every once in a while based on companies that I’ve seen. But if you just go and you say, ‘Ok, I’ve learned that we should have a culture of experimentation,’ and you put up posters in your office saying, ‘Ok, everybody, starting today we’re going to have a culture of experimentation!’ You’ll have absolutely no impact whatsoever. One of the things I really believe in is something called the Startup Way, which is just a diagram that helps me remember how to invest in change from the bottom up rather than mandating it from the top down. And it goes like this: Accountability; Process; Culture; People – in that order. It’s the foundation of how we hold people accountable; determines what kind of [experiments] we can and can’t use, what kind of process and infrastructure we will or won’t invest in – obviously if you hold people accountable only for quick, short-term results, then if there’s no long-term philosophy then there’s no point ever in investing in long-term infrastructure, for example. But if you don’t make those process investments, if you don’t have a system for testing hypotheses, you’re never going to get a culture of experimentation and hypothesis-driven development. And if you have an old, Dilbert-styled culture, you’re never really going to be able to retain the best people for the long term.

"So when people say, ‘The solution to having a high-growth company is to hire good people,’ that’s true. When people say, ‘You have to have a culture of experimentation,’ also true. ‘You need to really invest in infrastructure and tools,’ yup, that’s correct. And when they say, ‘You need to hold people accountable, not to vanity metrics, but to learning milestones,’ yup, that’s true. All four of those things are the one thing you have to do to have a high-growth, successful company. It’s just that there’s more than one number-one high-priority thing, because each of those is an interlocking part of the system. You can’t really do one without the other, or if you try, God help you."

--
Watch the rest of the webcast—and register for The Lean Startup Conference—for more specific information on all these topics. We sell conference tickets in blocks; when one block sells out, the price goes up. Register today for the best price possible.




0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

SSiMS talk on "Seeking Good Debate: Religion, Science, and Conflict in American Public Life"

by Salman Hameed

If you are in the area, join us for Wednesday lunch talk hosted by the Center for the Study of Science in Muslim Societies (SSiMS) and the School of Cognitive Science at Hampshire College. Here are the details:


Seeking Good Debate: Religion, Science, and Conflict in American Public Life
by 
Michael Evans
Neukom Fellow in the Neukom Institute for Computational Science and the Department of Film & Media Studies at Dartmouth College

Wednesday, October 30th, 2013
at Noon
Adele Simmons Hall, Hampshire College

Abstract: Why do science and religion seem to generate contentious public debate? In this talk I draw on computational linguistic analysis of over 10,000 newspaper articles, biographical research on key participants, and qualitative interviews with ordinary Americans to show that apparent conflicts in the public sphere over “science and religion” issues such as stem cell research, human origins, environmental policy, and the origins of sexuality actually result from a disconnection between the structure of elite debate in the American public sphere and the ideals of deliberative debate expected by ordinary Americans. I show how this insight helps explain several anomalies in current scholarship, such as why religious beliefs do not always impede support for science, why there is a gap between trust in science and trust in scientists, and why religious conservatives continue to dominate American public life. I also discuss the implications for science communication, particularly around issues where religion is involved.

Biographical statement: Michael Evans is an interdisciplinary scholar who uses computational and
qualitative methods to study contentious debates over science and technology issues. He has written about the social sources of public conflict over science and religion, how scientific elites shape interested publics, how narratives of continuity bolster scientific credibility, the role of religion in science communication, and the deliberative preferences of ordinary Americans, among other topics. He received his PhD in Sociology and Science Studies from the University of California, San Diego. Currently he is a Neukom Fellow in the Neukom Institute for Computational Science and the Department of Film & Media Studies at Dartmouth College. http://www.dartmouth.edu/~neukom/programs/neukom_fellows_14.html


In the Adele Simmons Hall (ASH) Lobby at Hampshire College.         
A light lunch will be available at noon.

0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Exciting News!

We are excited to share with you our newest adventures!  We are both opening up our own individual Teachers Pay Teachers stores, as well as our own individual teaching blogs. We will no longer be writing blog posts on Lesson Plan SOS. In addition, we will be transferring all the lessons we wrote to our respective Teachers Pay Teachers store. Paul and Karen have been a tremendous help with transferring our lessons over to our new Teachers Pay Teachers stores!!! :) We love TPT! We hope to have all of our old lessons and all well as some new and exciting ones transferred over to our stores and active by November 1, 2013....so stay tuned! If you followed our Lesson Plan SOS Teachers Pay Teachers store, you will automatically be following our new Teachers Pay Teachers stores. However, we can't transfer the followers to our new blogs- so be sure to do so!!!

We've loved working with you over the years.  It has been great getting to know so many of you! Thank you for all of the memories you helped us create! 

We hope you'll check out our new blogs and Teachers Pay Teachers Stores!!!

  Click here to go to Nicole's new blog and click here to visit Nicole's TPT store.

Inspire Me, ASAP


Click here to go to Melissa's new blog and click here to visit Melissa's TPT store.

If you have any questions, please contact:

Melissa at inspiremeasap@gmail.com

 or Nicole at nicole@simplysweetlessons.com


0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Halloween Treat Special: The Devil’s Dentures!

We all know there’s really no such thing as a truly frightening Halloween treat, but that doesn’t mean we can’t give our guests a few moments of pause, as they process the sight of these fun, fang-filled apples staring up at them. Well, actually those are the bloody eyeball truffles staring up at them, but you get the idea. 

I kind of like the minimalist look here, but there are dozens of ways you could up the grossness factor with these. Maybe some fancy fruit gummy worms, or rice pudding “maggots?"

It’s been a while since we posted a “scary” Halloween treat, and since most tend to be sugar bombs, I thought it’d be nice to share something a little healthier. I’m assuming there will be no shortage of candy around. Enjoy!


0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

هلموا الى ربكم PDF


0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Oh Nooo. Lou Reed - RIP

by Salman Hameed

Well this sucks.


Here is Lou flying into the Sun:



An excerpt from Fly into the Sun:

The earth is weeping, the sky is shaking
the stars split to their core
And every proton and unnamed neutron
is fusing in my bones

And an unnamed mammal is darkly rising
as man burns from his tomb
And I look at this as a blissful moment
to fly into the sun

Fly into the sun
fly into the sun
I'd burn up into a million pieces
and fly into the sun

To end this mystery
answer my mystery
I'd look at this as a wondrous moment
to end this mystery

Fly into the sun
fly into the sun
I'd break up into a million pieces
and fly into the sun
----

And here are couple of great songs (from many many others) for a taste and a reminder:



from his Velvet Underground days:



And how can we not end with A Walk on the Wild Side:


0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Next Up: Terrifying Halloween Treat

I'm about to post a Halloween treat that's so scary, I actually had to pixelate the photo! Stay tuned...if you dare.



0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Ansar Abbasi is a conservative hack and Pervez Hoodbhoy should not have engaged with him...

by Salman Hameed

More than ten years ago, talk shows on new private television channels in Pakistan were a breath of fresh air. For the first time, you could hear multiple opinions on all sorts of topics. The quality of those early talk shows was often quite good. But then, the open format of talk shows became more and more chaotic. If the guests themselves would not get into a verbal fight, the anchors would often egg them on. It was all good for rating.

Pervez Hoodbhoy (full disclosure that he is a good friend of mine) is often on the talk shows to present the increasingly limited liberal views. You pick a topic: Minority rights, blasphemy law, issue of problematic contents in textbooks, or even in the sad saga of the claim of the miraculous "water-kit" - a water-powered car that would solve all of Pakistan's energy crisis. As you can imagine, Pervez's positions are not the crowd pleasers.

So now we have this episode where Pervez and a journalist Ansar Abbasi got into a verbal fight. It is awful! I think both of them are way way out of line. This is not the way to have a conversation - and Ansar Abbasi kept calling Pervez a "Jahil" - a particularly pejorative term for an ignorant (in fact, he kept on saying that how come they let this jahil let teach in a college). Pervez walked out after that. The three minute brouhaha is below.

But let me just contextualize Abbasi a bit. Ansar Abbasi is the journalist who complained that the new 10th grade Urdu textbook (Punjab Board) does not contain sufficient Islam references. Oh but in his Urdu column, he argues that this was a conspiracy to impose secularization by the Punjab government (curious note: the government in Punjab is Pakistan Muslim League - which is to the "right" of a considerably conservative political center). Pervez called him out on this past April:
At the outset, one needs to know that the withdrawn book was intended solely for the teaching of Urdu as a language, and should be judged on these grounds alone. Any book for teaching a language must introduce the student to great poets and essayists and delve into linguistic nuances and subtleties. It should not be just a supplementary text for teaching Islamic studies. Students use an entire, separate book for Islamiat. 
This episode is important for only one reason: the new Urdu reader represented an attempt, albeit a feeble one, to remove the blinkers forced upon students by General Ziaul Haq’s education fantasia. The 1980s Islamisation of education meant that every subject — languages, geography, history, social studies, chemistry, physics, mathematics, etc. — could only be viewed through a narrow prism. All else was to be shunned and filtered out. It is this attempt to break loose that Mr Abbasi finds so terribly objectionable.
And now Ansar Abbasi has gone after Malala (and a tamer version in English). For what? Amongst other things, he is hurt that Malala is too soft on Salman Rushdie (she argues for freedom of speech while disagreeing with the contents of Satanic Verses, more particularly she says: "‘Is Islam such a weak religion that it cannot tolerate a book written against it? Not my Islam!”"), she talks about the rights of Ahamadis, the problems with the blasphemy law, that Pakistan lost three wars with India (which is a factual statement accepted everywhere in the world except in Pakistan's textbooks), etc. etc. Oh wait. And the horror of it all for Abbasi: She criticized Pakistan's brutal military dictator from the 1980s, General Zia ul Haq, and his "Islamization" policies that Pakistan is still dealing with. The problem is that Abbasi is a fan of Zia - and Malala's criticism of his hero really crosses him.

It is in the context of the recent Abbasi's column on Malala and the prior history of Hoodbhoy-Abbasi interaction that you should view this altercation on this "talk-show". Abbasi's regressive and often offensive views are still no excuse for Pervez to engage in this manner. This is wrong. Period. You will also notice that the anchor is simply sitting there and enjoying the fight. Shame on him as well (Fox News has nothing on these guys...). It is painful, but if you can stomach it, here is the clip:


0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Saturday Video: An idiosyncratic short film about Giordano Bruno

by Salman Hameed

Here is an intriguing short film (about 20 minutes): Giordano Bruno in Conscious Memory. Bruno, of course, has come to stand in as a symbol for free speech etc., but that is a later construction (see this earlier post: Why was Giordano Bruno burnt at the stake? But this movie, takes it in another direction and presents his broader influence, including on the writings of Shakespeare (they were contemporaries - and some have suggested this connection. I don't know anything about this to comment on it). Despite the acting and some limited camera work, I like the ambitious nature of the short film. Enjoy!


0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

New issue of CyberOrient and a call for papers on History of Modernity and Telephony in the non-West

by Salman Hameed

The last two weeks has been incredibly busy - and hence the lack of posts here. I blame the government shutdown. I guess this was a sympathy shutdown here on Irtiqa. But lets start the things rolling again. So first, here is a call for papers in the journal, CyberOrient, for a special issue on History of Modernity and Telephony in the non-West. Here are the details (tip from Tabsir).

Call for Papers for CyberOrientVol. 8, Iss. 2, 2014
Submission deadline: 30 April 2014 (Full Papers)
Special Issue: History of Modernity and Telephony in the non-West
Guest Editor: Burçe Çelik 
Aim 
For the past few decades, history of modernization began to be written by focusing on how technologies as components of modernization processes change the lives of humans, their daily practices and imaginations, and the ways in which they construct and express their identities. Telephony, which functions in both public and private spheres and witnesses social and political changes in private as well as professional relations, is regarded as especially important for historical analysis. Functioning on multiple levels, social history of telephony can unearth the ways in which technologies obtain meanings and values in changing cultural contexts and the dynamics of social, political and cultural transformations. The history of modernization in the non-western societies is often studied by focusing on the projects of the rulers and on the discourses of the ruling parties that aim a social/political change in accordance with a particular Occidentalism – where modernity is imagined with a model of the western modernization processes. Yet, the question of how people of these landscapes contributed to the modernization processes and how they produced their own modern practices in daily organizations, relations and experiences, did not receive enough scholarly attention.
This special issue of CyberOrient invites articles that focus on the history of modernity and telephony in the non-west that take the user perspective to the center. Topics could include the daily practices of users with telephone technology, the meaning and values that have been attributed to this technology by users, the role of telephony within the social, cultural and political struggles of users, and the effect of the ownership or non-ownership of telephony in social, cultural and political lives of individuals and collectives. We welcome submissions from across disciplines and methodological approaches that are empirically and critically grounded. 
SubmissionArticles should be submitted directly to Burçe Çelik (burce.celik@bahcesehir.edu.tr) and Vit Sisler (vit.sisler@ff.cuni.cz). Articles should be between 6,000 and 8,000 words (including references), and follow the AAA style in referencing and citations. Upon acceptance, articles will be published online with free access in autumn 2014.

And to give you a flavor of the journal, here is the latest issue of CyberOrient that is available online:


Articles
Online and Offline Continuities, Community and Agency on the Internet
Jon W. Anderson
http://www.cyberorient.net/article.do?articleId=8355

The Earth Is Your Mosque (and Everyone Else’s Too): Online Muslim
Environmentalism and Interfaith Collaboration in UK and Singapore
Lisa Siobhan Irving
http://www.cyberorient.net/article.do?articleId=8336

Telling the Truth about Islam? Apostasy Narratives and Representations
of Islam on WikiIslam.net
Daniel Enstedt and Göran Larsson
http://www.cyberorient.net/article.do?articleId=8459

Comments
Digital Images and Visions of Jihad: Virtual Orientalism and the
Distorted Lens of Technology
Raymond Pun
http://www.cyberorient.net/article.do?articleId=8391

Reviews
Review: Arabités numériques. Le printemps du Web arabe
Luboš Kropáček
http://www.cyberorient.net/article.do?articleId=8352

Review: Media, Power, and Politics in the Digital Age. The 2009
Presidential Election Uprising in Iran
Zuzana Krihova
http://www.cyberorient.net/article.do?articleId=8386

Review: iMuslims: Rewiring the House of Islam. Islamic Civilization
and Muslim Networks
Vit Sisler
http://www.cyberorient.net/article.do?articleId=8385

0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Enjoying Pomegranates with Less Mess

This time of year pomegranates make their annual appearance in produce aisles, and despite being beautiful, delicious, and nutritious, many shoppers avoid them because they simply don’t know how to work with the colorful, but mysterious fruit. This video shows a great method for harvesting all those juicy seeds without any mess. By the way, the individual kernels are water-proof, so don't worry about them losing any flavor in the bowl. Enjoy!


0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Song: Picture a Christmas


Picture a stable in Judea


Picture a sacred, silent night.


And can you hear the angels, near


And see the stars so bright?


Picture the little baby Jesus.


Picture his life and words so dear.


Sing praise to him, remember him


as you picture Christmas this year.


Picture a kind and gentle Joseph.


Picture the mother, Mary, fair.


And can you see, so reverently, the shepherds kneeling there?


Picture the little baby Jesus.


Picture his life and words so dear.


Sing praise to him, remember him


As you picture Christmas this year.


0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

خطوات الى السعادة PDF


0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

“Local” Roasted Beets with Goat Cheese and Walnuts – Kill Once, Cook Twice

They say if you video blog long enough, you’ll eventually post a snuff film. Okay, so no one says that, but that’s what this roasted beets with goat cheese and walnuts kind of felt like, as I harvested my homegrown, and completely defenseless beet.

I was obviously kidding about vegetables being able to sense pain, but the more I think about it, who knows? Anyway, until I find out otherwise, I’ll assume the bloody root didn’t suffer for my pleasure, and just enjoy its incredible goodness. It’s the same assumption I use when eating chicken wings.

There are very few things that pair as perfectly as roasted beets and goat cheese. Simply a match made in occasional-vegetarian heaven. When you toss in some crunchy walnuts, foraged greens, and a simple walnut oil/vinegar dressing, you have something that’s way beyond the sum of the parts. 

I really can’t think of a more perfect fall lunch. By the way, in addition to making a great mid-day meal, this would also work nicely as a fancy side dish come holiday time, and you have plenty of time to practice. I hope you give this a try soon. Enjoy!


Ingredients for 2 portions:
1 or 2 tbsp walnut oil
1 roasted beet (*about 8 oz)
2 oz goat cheese
salt and pepper to taste
1/2 cup roasted chopped walnuts
2 tbsp champagne or sherry vinegar
thinly sliced beet greens and fresh chives to top
toasted walnut bread to serve with

*Note: Since beets come in all sorts of sizes, you’ll just have to go by feel. Roast a beet or two, slice it up, see how much you have, pick a baking dish that large enough for one layer, cover the bottom with walnut oil, toss in the beets, fill in between with goat cheese, season, bake and dress as you see fit.

0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Lean Analytics: The Best Numbers for Non-Tech Companies

Guest post by Lisa Regan, writer for The Lean Startup Conference.

Analytics spark more questions and discussion than almost any other aspect of the Lean Startup method. If you’re coming to them from outside the tech sector, the language around analytics can be particularly confusing. Alistair and Ben, co-authors of the book Lean Analytics, will help you sort it out in our next webcast, Lean Analytics for Non-tech Companies. The webcast is this Friday, October 25, at 10a PT and includes live Q&A with participants. Registration is free.

For those new to analytics, Alistair and Ben have a free Udemy course well worth checking out. It provides a basic introduction to analytics as they apply to Lean Startup, including sections on what metrics to use and how to interpret them. And it’s also a great starting point for learning the basic vocabulary and methods for analytics, especially for anyone in non-tech startups, where this kind of language is less prevalent. For instance, Ben lists out the worst of the “vanity metrics,” a term that describes appealing but meaningless or misleading numbers. And, Alistair carefully breaks down cohort analysis, a method of grouping users according to a shared criterion (all the users who joined in a given month, for instance, or during a particular campaign), and then demonstrates how you can test with those cohorts to yield actionable information. And, Ben goes over the difference between “leading” and “lagging” indicators--with the former able to tell you how to create growth by creating effective changes.

In the Udemy course, Alistair and Ben expand these basics into a description of how to create empathy, stickiness, virality, revenue, and scale. Stickiness, Ben and Alistair say, is where people move on too quickly--they don’t make sure they really have a product that has the right features and functionality to meet their customers’ needs. It’s here that analytics are important in checking your or your investors’ natural impulses to jump ahead to the next phase.

To help turn the conversation specifically to non-tech companies—the topic of our webcast this week—we asked Alistair to answer a few questions.

LSC: Tell us about the customer development you did for your book:

Alistair: We've been thrilled at how Lean Analytics seemed to resonate with founders. As operators of an accelerator—and founders in our own right—Ben and I had constantly struggled with what the “right” numbers are for a business. We decided to find out, and talked with around 130 founders, entrepreneurs, investors and analysts. The results were revealing: most people didn't know what “normal” was, but there were clear patterns that stood out.

While many of the organizations were technical, we also spoke to big non-tech companies, and smaller businesses like restaurant owners. Nearly all of the ones who'd been successful went through a natural process of customer development—what we call the “empathy” stage—followed by a tight focus on stickiness, then virality, then paid acquisition, and finally scaling.

LSC:  What's an example of one metric, other than revenue, that you might look at for a non-tech product?

Alistair: There are plenty. The Net Promoter Score is an obvious one for an established product—how likely are you to tell someone else about the product or service. It's a good measurement because it captures both satisfaction and virality. Customer support numbers, trouble-tickets, returns and complaints are good too. But they're all lagging indicators. In other words, they show you the horse left the barn.

Consider a restaurant. Revenue is a good, obvious metric; but maybe the number of people who don't leave a tip is a leading indicator of revenue. If you could find a way to measure that, and then you understood that there was a strong correlation between tipping rates or amounts and revenue, then you could experiment with things more cleanly. You could try different menus to different tables, and then look at tip amounts, and figure out earlier in the process whether the new menu was better or worse.

The reality, though, is that every company today is a tech company. The dominant channel by which we reach customers is the Internet, whether you're a small local restaurant on Yelp or a global maker of tissue paper. And the dominant tool we use to measure back-office operations is technology, from inventory to supply chain management to procurement to human resources.

The beautiful thing about this, to someone who's analytically minded, is that while humans are awful at recording things, software has no choice but to do so. As a result, we're awash in a sea of data that might yield good insights about the business. The challenge is to know what the biggest problem in the business is right now, then to find a metric that shows you, as early as possible in the customer lifecycle, whether that problem is getting better or worse.

LSC: Here's a common problem: you start measuring something, and you assume that the results will be clear enough to help you make additional decision about your product (for example, to pivot, persevere or kill an idea)--but then the results are hazy. What's a good step to take when your measurement Magic 8-Ball says, "Ask again later"?

Alistair: This is why it's so important to draw a line in the sand beforehand. Scientists know this: you formulate a hypothesis, and then you devise an experiment that will reveal the results. Unfortunately, as founders, we're so enthusiastic, so governed by our reality distortion field, that we often run the experiment and then find the results we want. This is confirmation bias, and it kills.

We often tell founders that a business plan is nonsense. A business model, on the other hand, is a snapshot of your business assumptions at this moment in time. Once you've stated those assumptions clearly, you run experiments to see if they're valid. We spoke with the head of innovation at one Fortune 500 company who told us his only metric for early-stage innovation is “how many assumptions have you tested this week?”

The confusion isn't that the results are hazy. It's that the business model is complex. If I think I can sell 100 widgets at $10 apiece, and they cost me $5 to build and market, that's a business model. But if my measurements show me that people will only pay $8 a widget, is that a failure? No—it means I now need to revise my assumptions and test whether people will buy 125 widgets instead, so I can generate the same revenue (and adjust my margins accordingly).

The Magic 8-Ball seldom says “Ask again later.” What it often says is “Revise your assumptions and test something else.” That's why the most critical attribute of early-stage product development is the ability to learn quickly.

LSC: For companies that aren't used to thinking in terms of metrics, any tips for getting a team on board?

Alistair:
As we say in the book, once, the leader was someone who could convince others to act in the absence of information. Today, the leader is someone who can ask the right questions. Data-driven business is here today; it's just not evenly distributed. That's changing, slowly. But there are things you can do to hasten it along.

The first is to use a small data victory to create an appetite for a bigger one. Take, for example, David Boyle at EMI. The company had billions of transactions locked away that might reveal how and why people bought music. But there was little support for analyzing it. So David started his own analysis project, surveying a million people about their music. This was brand new data, and he evangelized it within the organization. Everyone wanted some. Once there was a demand for this data, he earned the political capital to dig into the vast troves of historical information.

The second is to treat everything as a study. Many companies like certainty. We've joked that if a startup is an organization in search of a sustainable, repeatable business model, then a big company is an organization designed to perpetuate such a model. That's in direct conflict with disruption and innovation. So how do you deal with a boss who wants certainty? When we spoke with DHL, they told us that they consider every new initiative a learning exercise that might just happen to produce a new product or service. They've launched new business ideas that failed—but that failure taught them valuable things about a particular market, which they then shared with customers and used for strategic planning.

The simple reality is that with cloud computing, prototyping, social media, and other recent tools, the cost of trying something out is now vanishingly small. In fact, it's often cheaper than the old cost of a big study or research project. Companies need to learn that trying something out is how you conduct the study. Let's say you want to know about the burgeoning market for mobile widgets. So you create a mobile widget MVP. If it fails, you've successfully studied it. If it succeeds, you've successfully studied it, and built a new venture along the way.

The third is, when in doubt, collect and analyze data. We've done some work with the folks at Code for America. In one case, a group was trying to improve the Failure to Appear rate for people accused of a crime. This is a big deal: if you don't show up for court, it triggers a downward spiral of arrests and incarceration. But there were a lot of challenges to tackling the problem directly, so they took a different approach: they created tools to visualize the criminal justice system as a supply chain, making it easier to identify bottlenecks that showed where the system needed work most urgently.

If you're an intrapreneur tilting at corporate windmills, you need to embrace these kinds of tactics. Use small data victories to give management a taste of what's possible. Frame your work as a study that will be useful even if it fails. And when you run into roadblocks, grab data and analyze it in new ways to find where you'll get the most leverage.

--
Our webcast with Alistair and Ben, Lean Analytics for Non-tech Companies, is this Friday; register today and come ready with your questions. Alistair will also be giving a workshop at The Lean Startup Conference, December 9 – 11 in San Francisco. Join us there.

0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Next Up: Death of a Beet



0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Bolognese Sauce – Hip Hip Hazan!

This bolognese sauce is dedicated to the late, great Marcella Hazan, who passed away in September, at the age of 89. She was considered the Julia Child of Italian food, and at a time when most Americans though “bolognese” was spaghetti sauce with chunks of hamburger it, Marcella taught us just how magnificent this meat sauce could be.

One thing that always surprises people making this recipe for the first time is the absence of garlic. Hazan railed against the common belief that garlic should be added to any and all Italian recipes. She once wrote, “the unbalanced use of garlic is the single greatest cause of failure in would-be Italian cooking,” and “Garlic can be exciting when you turn to it sporadically, on impulse, but on a regular basis, it is tiresome.”

Would a few minced garlic cloves ruin this incredibly delicious pasta sauce? Probably not, but since this is supposed to be something of a tribute, I decided to remain true. Speaking of ingredients, I used ground beef here, but I’ve also done this with cubed chuck roast, which works wonderfully as well.

Anyway, I really hope you give this classic bolognese a try, and if you do, and there’s some extra wine around, please raise a glass, and toast the “Nonna” of Italian cuisine in America. Enjoy!


Ingredients for 6 portions:
1 tbsp olive oil
2 tbsp butter
1 cup finely diced onions
1/2 cup finely diced celery
1/2 cup finely diced carrot
1 1/2  tsp salt, or to taste
freshly ground black pepper and cayenne to taste
1/8 tsp ground nutmeg
1 1/2 lb ground beef
1 1/2 cups milk
2 cups white wine
1 can San Marzano plum tomatoes (28-oz), about 3 cups
2 cups water, or as needed

0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^

Speaker Lineup for the 2013 Lean Startup Conference

Guest post by Lisa Regan, writer for The Lean Startup Conference.

Between webcasts and interviews, we’ve been gradually introducing some of the speakers who are appearing at this year’s Lean Startup Conference. Now we’re ready to announce the full lineup, along with a special deal, explained below. There are some speakers on this year’s roster whom you've heard of before and who who deliver great talks every time out—people like Marc Andreessen, Steve Blank, Reid Hoffman, Chris Dixon and Kent Beck. But we’ve also put a big emphasis on finding terrific speakers who are new to the conference—people we’ve been posting about, like Steven Hodas, Mariya Yao, Khalid Smith and Nicole Tucker-Smith.

Also among the new speakers is Keya Dannenbaum, founder and CEO of ElectNext. She’ll talk in practical terms about how her organization is learning to be one that pivots. Pivoting means accepting hard truths—and to get a sense of Keya’s experience in that department, we asked her to give us an example of something she built that, in retrospect, she could have built more quickly to have learned the same thing. Here’s what she said:

It’s well-known that publishers, particularly those of the traditional news variety, are facing challenging financial times, and we always knew that our means of making money wouldn’t be to charge them. So we spent some time iterating--leanly, we thought--on the revenue model.

This past spring we stumbled on a genius idea – in order to make our publisher products work, we were scanning millions of articles and categorizing them by politicians, issues and popularity, among other dimensions. We could easily (easily! ha) take all that data and package it up for politicians, in a product to help them monitor their earned media.We visited political offices, and saw them painfully cutting articles out of physical newspapers and pasting them in binders.

We saw “sophisticated” operations using Google Alerts.  We asked why they weren’t using BGov or Meltwater, and we heard they were priced out of those markets. We pitched a product we hadn’t built yet and had 80% signup rates for a free trial. BOOM. Lean validation. So we spent a couple months building the thing. We put together a small salesforce to sell it…. And no one bought it.

There were a number of reasons: the users (from whom net promoter scores averaged 9.5! Irrelevant, it turns out) weren’t the buyers; the buyers wanted a feature set no one would have used; the buyers only made purchases once a year…the list goes on. But the real reason for that product’s failure was our mistake in not charging up front. We would have learned everything we needed to know in the third week of assessing the opportunity. And that’s why we now pre-sell all our paid products.

Now’s a good time to remind you that many of our 2013 speakers are participating in free webcasts this fall—which include live Q&A with participants. Past webcasts have featured returning Lean Startup experts, like Patrick Vlaskovits and Brant Cooper, who talked with Eric Ries about Lean Startup in enterprise companies. New webcasts include one on Friday, October 25, Lean Analytics for Non-tech Companies with popular speakers Alistair Croll and Ben Yoskovitz, and on one November 5, Lean Impact--Implementing Lean Startup in Mission-driven Organizations. Tomorrow, October 22, we’ve got a webcast on Lean Startup for Growing Companies with Wyatt Jenkins, VP of product at Shutterstock, Ari Gesher, senior engineer at Palantir, and Eric.

This is Wyatt’s first time speaking at the conference, and he’ll be looking at some truly advanced techniques for A/B testing. Meantime, we’ve asked him to talk about how Shutterstock has scaled Lean Startup techniques as the company has grown into one of the biggest two-sided marketplaces on the web. He gave us a quick rundown on two major growth challenges he’s faced:

Challenge #1: Vanity Metrics. The problem of vanity metrics seemed to exacerbate itself as we added more employees. Everyone wanted to be more accountable and measure their progress (a great problem to have), but there weren't enough meaningful metrics for everyone to rally around, so people latch onto other metrics that may or may not be helpful. Product team velocity is a great example. It's a helpful metric when trying to figure out the efficiency of a team, but at the end of the day, it has no bearing on whether what the team is building is effective or not. You can have a team with great velocity building crap that no one wants or vice versa.

Another Vanity metric I've seen is visits—a stat that I've rarely seen anyone take action on. Usage of a new feature was a useless stat for us until we changed it to repeat usage. Lastly, we used to track deploys to production because we were so proud of our continuous deployment practice, but past a certain threshold (we are somewhere north of 200 deploys a month) this is a vanity metric.

Challenge #2: Technical Debt. This might be one of our biggest challenges that we actively work on every day. As with most evolving systems that are over 10 years old, ours has increased complexity making it difficult to move quickly. There are some amazing efforts going on internally to simplify our system and modernize our stack, but hiring teams of developers for this effort is still something new to our organization. Oftentimes there are decisions made without understanding of the technical ramifications, not because someone is vindictive, but because they have a pre-conceived notion of how complex something is and they don't want to call a meeting about it (part of keeping our process streamlined). Working to keep systems simple is an important part of our product strategy. We try to delete less-used features often in order to have a simple, scalable system. Still, we have a ways to go.

Other new speakers this year include Kimberly Bryant of Black Girls Code, Robin Chase of Zipcar and Buzzcar, Matt Mullenweg of Automattic/WordPress, Mureen Allen of Optum, Alexis Ringwald of LearnUp, Catherine Bracy of Code for America, John Goulah of Etsy and many, many more.

Among the speakers we’re bringing back this year are those whose talks generated a lot of interest in the past and who have more we can learn from. So, for example, you’ll see Andres Glusman of Meetup, who last year talked engagingly about the myths he confronted in implementing Lean Startup methods at his company, Malkovich Bias among them:


Dan Milstein gave a popular 2012 talk on how to run a Five Whys and deal with failure in a profitable way. On a webcast this summer, he shared direct advice for the engineering crowd, and he’ll have more ideas-you-use-right-now for us in December.


Justin Wilcox, who joined us earlier this year for a lively webcast on applying Lean Startup ideas beyond Silicon Valley, will be returning to follow up on his surprising 2012 talk on pricing and MVPs. You’ll remember Justin for his helpful distinction between a business and a hobby, and the tendency of startups to accidentally wind up in the second category.


Steph Hay opened our eyes last year with a talk on testing content strategies. She’ll be back with deeper advice in December and previewed that in an interview earlier this year and. Here’s here 2012 talk.

You’ll also see Diane Tavenner with an update on Summit Charter Schools, where last year rapid iteration was both raising math scores and revealing the weakness of lecture as a knowledge delivery method. Her 2012 talk—which suggested the possibility of truly disruptive innovation to address entrenched issues in education--was a huge discussion starter.

--

Now that you know some of the people who’ll be speaking at the 2013 Lean Startup Conference, you’re probably wishing you already had tickets. The good news is that in a way, you can get them. Until tomorrow, October 22 at 11:59 PT, we’re rolling back prices to our mid-August level—that’s three price breaks back, and more than 40% off the standard rate. Register now, as this price won’t be available after tomorrow.

0 comments:

welcome to my blog. please write some comment about this article ^_^